The Riding Gravel Forum
Register Calendar Latest Topics Chat
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment  
Animal494

Member
Registered:
Posts: 24
Reply with quote  #1 
http://www.bicycling.com/bikes-gear/is-this-the-2018-specialized-diverge
0
Animal494

Member
Registered:
Posts: 24
Reply with quote  #2 
New bike day from spec....

https://www.bikerumor.com/2017/06/15/new-specialized-diverge-drops-future-shock-swat-ton-options/

Uuuhhhh..... is it just me or is the stand over heights listed unusually high??? The stack numbers are better (taller) than I expected out of spec, but those stand over heights.... ????

0
edgold

Starter
Registered:
Posts: 6
Reply with quote  #3 
I would assume they are wrong for the carbon bikes since the numbers for the aluminum frames are in line with normal.
0
JoeFriday

Member
Registered:
Posts: 53
Reply with quote  #4 
If the numbers are right, they don't even make a bike that would fit me. Nice looking bike, but Specialized is playing the soup nazi on me.
0
Animal494

Member
Registered:
Posts: 24
Reply with quote  #5 
The Spec website is now updated with the new diverge. The standover heights for the carbon frame appear to be more reasonable on the spec website. Seems to be a big gap btw the $3k clunky 105 shifters model and the $4k sram force1 model, no?
0
KeithC

Starter
Registered:
Posts: 1
Reply with quote  #6 
What is 105 like compared to force 1? I've actually never used anything Shimano before.
0
Animal494

Member
Registered:
Posts: 24
Reply with quote  #7 
105 is one level below SRAM Force.  SRAM Rival22 is the 105 equivalent (or rival if you will).  SRAM Force1 technically has no Shimano 105 equivalent as 105 only comes in 2x11. 

The Shimano 105 Hydro shifters (RS505) have a certain.... aesthetic. Many reviews claim they are comfortable, but whew... they are huge.

I have a 105 disc groupo (50/34-11/32) on my current bike with mechanical disc brakes.  Have had great luck with it.

For my next bike I'm considering Ultegra or Rival22.  Thoughts? 
0
reubenc

Starter
Registered:
Posts: 17
Reply with quote  #8 
Really disappointed in the colors on the women's lineup... That aluminum 105 w/ the future shock at $1800 was the bike for my wife, but maroon!?!? Yikes! https://www.specialized.com/us/en/women/bikes/road/adventure/womensdivergee5comp/133789
0
JGamm

Starter
Registered:
Posts: 19
Reply with quote  #9 
Does she actually need a women's specific bike? It sounds like the frames are the same through the range of sizes so unless she is very short and needs a frame size that is smaller than what they offer in the men's version they should be comparable minus the saddle and crank length. The bars may be narrower and the stem shorter as well but that may not be better than what comes stock on the men's build. My wife is 5'5" and she has actually fit better on the men's bikes than the women's specific bikes in the past. I would say test ride both and see if she can tell any difference it may just end up being a warm and fuzzy marketing thing rather than a necessity to be on a women's specific bike.
0
LewisQC

Member
Registered:
Posts: 29
Reply with quote  #10 

0
tacobellbiker

Starter
Registered:
Posts: 11
Reply with quote  #11 
I like the concept of the bike very much but the colors this year don't appeal to me at all.

I think they nailed the design with the understated, nature-inspired colors of the Sequoia.
0
GOTA

Member
Registered:
Posts: 23
Reply with quote  #12 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animal494
New bike day from spec.... https://www.bikerumor.com/2017/06/15/new-specialized-diverge-drops-future-shock-swat-ton-options/ Uuuhhhh..... is it just me or is the stand over heights listed unusually high??? The stack numbers are better (taller) than I expected out of spec, but those stand over heights.... ????


I keep thinking they have to be wrong.  Why else would the aluminum frames be listed as around 25 mm less than the carbon?  
0
meenanm

Starter
Registered:
Posts: 12
Reply with quote  #13 
I like the new Diverge.  I will likely test ride one in the next few weeks.  I've been fairly happy with my Ridley X-Trail.  But, it lack in max tire size.  I'm interested in seeing how the Future Shock works.  Some of the reviews are saying it has some promise.  Not a huge fan of the look of the stem, but can get over it for the functionality, if it works.  For me the dropper post might be overkill.  Only a handful of the places I currently ride would benefit. But, maybe that is just me.

Not a huge fan of the colors on the S-Works model, but that is the one I'm eying.  I really like the 1x with the XTR Di2 shifting rear.  Maybe we'll see.

0
JoeFriday

Member
Registered:
Posts: 53
Reply with quote  #14 
I hadn't given the Diverge much consideration since I wasn't that impressed with the previous version. But it is looking much better these days. Clearance for 42mm tires (47mm with 650B wheels) is very nice! But it's a bit chubby at 20.2 lbs for a 54cm. I'd expect a pound or two less for a $3-4k bike.

https://cyclingtips.com/2017/06/2018-specialized-diverge-gravel-bike-review/
0
BluesDawg

Senior Member
Registered:
Posts: 166
Reply with quote  #15 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animal494
The Spec website is now updated with the new diverge. The standover heights for the carbon frame appear to be more reasonable on the spec website. Seems to be a big gap btw the $3k clunky 105 shifters model and the $4k sram force1 model, no?


It is a big jump. Wish there was a Force 22 or Ultegra option. Along with the higher level components (including a carbon crank), the Expert comes with a $750 Roval SLX 24 wheelset and the SWAT box for the $1K price jump over the Comp model.
0
sgtrobo

Member
Registered:
Posts: 65
Reply with quote  #16 
I had the chance to ride a 2018 Diverge Comp and I gotta say I'm quite impressed with the Futureshok, surprisingly so.

I'm a clyde, ~250#/115kg, and the future shock ahd me worried because I figured if I stood up off the saddle and hammered that I would feel bobbing and bouncing, and I can honestly say, there was none of that.  Yet when I went downhill on a full cobblestone old road, it took the buzz off almost completely.  The 56cm Comp was 19.6 lbs without pedals or bottle cages in my LBS but it felt lighter than that on the cobblestone climb I did. 

It can fit the 38c Trigger Pro with room for fenders.

It has a comfortably relaxed endurance geometry that is ideal for a guy like me with stubby arms and fake cervical vertebrae, so if you want your stem slammed so you can be fully aero then perhaps this isn't what you're looking for.

Oh, and the standover heights on the website are/were all jacked up.  Subtract 100cm for the ones that are way out of whack.  There's more standover clearance for me on the new 56cm Diverge than on my 2015 Roubaix Comp.  I confirmed that first thing.  

I gotta say, the 48/32 Praxis with the 105 shifted surprisingly well.  I'm more a fan of SRAM road shifters, but I wasn't at all agitated with the 105s.  They fit pretty well on the Hover bars so that shifting and breaking in the drops is perfectly fine. 

Yes, very very impressed.
0
Animal494

Member
Registered:
Posts: 24
Reply with quote  #17 
Thanks, sgtrobo! Glad to hear the top tubes aren't as dangerous as the website indicates!

Bike looks great. Just a big jump from a 105 to a Force1. I haven't laid hands on those 105 hydro shifters, but boy you can see them from a mile away (ick)!

Last year they had an Ultegra build for 3400. 3000 for a 105 seems steep.
0
BluesDawg

Senior Member
Registered:
Posts: 166
Reply with quote  #18 
sgtrobo, were the Hover bars the flared version like on the Sequoia or the ones with the regular vertical drops?
0
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation: